Nebraska Property Rights |
|
|
|
Since the decision by the United States Supreme Court in Kelo v. City of New London many states across the country have taken measures to help protect the rights of private ownership. The controversial Kelo decision held that a local government can take the private property of one person and give it to another private entity. While the Court’s ruling was seen by many as a serious blow to citizen’s constitutionally protected rights of private property ownership, the decision prompted a number of states to initiate legislative reform to help curb eminent domain abuse.
The Castle Coalition has released a report, grading each of the states based on their efforts to protect private property owners and their rights based on changes in their respective state laws. The Castle Coalition is the Institute for Justice's nationwide grassroots property rights activism project that teaches home and small business owners how to protect themselves and stand up to abuse by governments and developers who seek to use eminent domain to take private property for their own gain. Stated below is the letter grade, as given by the Castle Coalition, along with a description of the changes that have occurred since Kelo v. City of New London. Nebraska Castle Coalition letter grade ofThe state of Nebraska has seen very little reform since the landmark case of Kelo v. City of New London, however, the state has begun to take steps in the right direction. In 2006, the Nebraska Legislature passed Legislative Bill 924, which prohibits the use of eminent domain if it is primarily for an economic development purpose. Although this language restricts private developers from taking land for developments, it does not apply to public or private projects that make all or a major portion of the property available for use by the public. The language in this bill is vague and has room for interpretation, which is problematic for property owners. It could be argued that commercial developments would fall under this category, meaning property owners are still not fully protected against private property transfers. This bill does, however, clarify that agricultural property cannot be designated blighted by local governments. Private property that’s deemed blighted may be transferred to private developers under no time constraints, meaning that property owners have little protection with this hazy definition. SummaryNebraska has taken small steps toward protecting property owners against eminent domain abuse, and what the state really needs now is total reform concerning blighted areas and how areas are designated blighted. Once the state sees that, property owners will see significant amounts of protection. Click to read more about Legislative Bill 924. |
" ...It is so refreshing to know a law office that does what it says it will do...you are truly an expert in this field and I am greatful..."
"I just want to say thank you...for your advice and your time...I am still shocked that you were so generous with your time and expertise and I want to thank you..."
- Natalie Nahey, Portland, OR
"You treated us better than family! [You] came right to our home and went to Madison for us, you were the best! [The] DOT was so smart when they were here; you showed them that the little guy can be right and got us a nice chunk of money!....Thank you so much!"
- John & Pat Schmalz, Menasha, WI
"Biersdorf & Associates has an ingrain[ed] desire to help people!"
"You did more than anyone else ever tried to do for us and no words can truly explain what that means to us."
"I can unequivocally claim that we have been very pleased with the work that your law firm has performed on our behalf. Our only regret is that we did not contact your firm sooner..."
"...Thank You. It is a small thing compared to what you did for me, I still am amazed at your generosity."
"[Biersdorf & Associates] knowledge and experience in the condemnation process stood out."
"Dan listened to me; some of the attorney's I have spoken to around my state do all the talking, but do not hear what we are saying."
"[I was] very satisfied. [We] got more money than the DOT offered. [It was] great working with Biersdorf & Associates."